Archive for June, 2009

PWS Piston AR Conversion Review

Monday, June 8th, 2009
PWS Piston Rifle Close Up

PWS Conversion piston rifle close up

A few years ago when a few HK416 uppers were released to the general public there was a big surge of interest in gas piston AR’s and the perceived advantages over Direct Impingement (DI) guns.  There were few options available if you wanted a gas piston rifle or upper that would work with a standard AR lower.
I became more interested after taking a Larry Vickers class when he described the development history of the HK416 and his involvement with it.  He also had good things to say about the LWRC series of gas piston uppers and rifles.  Unfortunately, LWRC was still having quality control issues and HK416 uppers were running in the neighborhood of $5K so availability was limited.
I stumbled across the Primary Weapons System Gas Piston Conversion when I was shopping online for one of their DNTC compensators.  The big advantage of the PWS system to me was that they would install their piston kit on the customer’s existing upper.  Since I had a few components already laying around such as a Colt 1/9 heavy barrel, upper receiver and bolt carrier group this seemed like a logical choice to get in to piston AR’s.  I was also able to take advantage of their Military/Law Enforcement discount to reduce the cost further.
PWS Gas Block and Centurion Arms HK Front Sight

PWS Gas Block and Centurion Arms HK style Front Sight

I sent in my components after placing an order through the PWS site and received my upper back a few weeks later.  I had ordered the PWS FSC556 compensator along with a barrel threading service as well as the Daniel Defense 9.5 FSP Lite rail.  My initial trip to the range proved to be a disappointment with the upper short stroking every other round.  I tried several different brands of ammo which worked with my other AR.  Same results even after using different magazines as well as swapping lower receivers.  I contacted Todd at PWS and explained what happened, he seemed surprised as they do a test fire on each upper before it leaves using Wolf (normally underpowered) ammo.  I believed him since the shell deflector on the upper had some wear marks which weren’t there when I sent the parts in.  He asked that I send it back to PWS so they could investigate the cause of failure.

After I got it back from PWS I took it out to the range and fired about 200 rounds to zero and function test it since I had planned on taking it to a carbine instructor class with Bennie Cooley.  It worked well and my confidence was restored in the weapon.  PWS stated that they opened up the gas port slightly to fix it.

I took it to the Bennie Cooley carbine course in August 2008 and ran it for the first half of the day before I started having malfunctions again.  Same symptoms, it would fire one or two rounds before having a failure to extract.  I switched rifles so that I could complete the training day before attempting to troubleshoot it later that night.  The only thing that I could see was that it appeared that the gas block was slightly loose, enough that you could see a small bit of a gap between the block and the barrel.  I tried shooting it the next day with no improvement and sent it back to PWS after the course.

Surefire 6P with clickie tailcap and shock isolated bezel in a Larue LT606 offset mount

Surefire 6P with clickie tailcap and shock isolated bezel in a Larue LT606 offset mount

After speaking with several people at PWS I asked that they turn down the barrel from the HBAR profile to a mid-weight profile as the combined weight of the gas block, flashlight and barrel made it very muzzle heavy.  They charged me about $125 for that but later offered to have the gas piston assembly Ion-Bonded for me at no charge if I was willing to wait an extra few weeks.  I agreed since it seemed like a fair deal.  As far as the malfunctions I was experiencing, PWS explained that some of the factory barrels from Colt had an almost undetectable taper where the front sight base was mounted and that could cause gas leakage.

I took it out to the range again and fired another 200 rounds to confirm zero and experienced no malfunctions.  More recently I switched out the Aimpoint M2 with an Eotech 552 in a Larue mount and found that the HK style diopter sights sit too low with the Larue riser and I cannot align the iron sights through the Eotech window.  I still don’t have enough rounds through it to feel 100% confident but I have been very impressed with the professionalism and customer service from the PWS staff, they even sent me a free hat the last time I had the upper sent in.

A friend shooting the PWS AR with Eotech mounted

A friend shooting the PWS AR with Eotech mounted on Larue LT-110 riser

Since the whole premise of having a piston AR is increased reliability I see no advantage to my current PWS set up over my conventional DI carbines.  I like the DD 9.5 FSP rail as I’m able to get my support hand farther out on the gun but the PWS gas block vents in that area which makes it extremely hot.  I normally wear gloves but even then I can feel the rails getting hot.  Rail covers help and I’ve switched to Magpul XT panels since they seem to offer the best balance of texture and heat shielding compared to the ladder style rail covers included with the Daniel Defense rail.

The HK style sights have been disappointing, the front sight post is fixed and too wide to make any sort of precision shot even at 50 yards to zero.  The rear diopter is too small to effectively shoot in any form of low light, you will need a white light to backlight the front sight post in order to get a clear sight picture.

Having briefly experimented with running different collapsible stocks including the Magpul MOE and Vltor Modstock, I found that because of the increased weight toward the muzzle the only stock that can counter balance that is the LMT SOPMOD buttstock.  It is also the most comfortable (and expensive) of all the options.

I have been impressed with the PWS FSC556 compensator, coupled with the piston drive and increased muzzle weight there is almost no muzzle rise even when shooting rapid fire.

The VTAC padded sling is attached to the rail using a Midwest Industries QD socket on the left side of the rail closest to the upper receiver.  I find that location allows me to run my support hand out and activate the Surefire without interfering with the sling attachment.

The grip is an Ergo ambidextrous SureGrip which fits my hand perfectly but still allows me to activate the ambi-safety without shifting my firing grip.

I have a few carbine classes scheduled before the end of the year and plan on giving the system a more thorough evaluation.

Seeking out firearms training for the first time

Saturday, June 6th, 2009

Several factors to consider in no particular order:

1. What weapon platform? Pistol, shotgun, carbine or some combination of both?
2. How much money are you willing to spend?
3. How much time are you willing to give up to include travel?
4. What’s your training objective?
5. Which instructor?

1) My normal recommendation is for people to take a pistol class first as the basic fundamentals of sight alignment, sight picture and trigger press can be installed immediately and is more readily transferable to other weapon platforms. Also, for most non-military people it is the most accessible whether its a night stand gun or if you have a CCW license that allows you to carry (almost) all the time. Almost all shooting ranges, both outdoor and indoor will have bays for pistols which will make it easier for you to practice once the class is finished.

Jeff Gonzales coaching student shooting on the move with pistol

Jeff Gonzales coaching student shooting on the move with pistol

A shotgun may be the most affordable and politically correct tool available for self defense but generally requires 2 handed manipulation.

I consider a carbine type weapon such as an AR or a Beretta Storm to be the most capable and easiest to shoot for defensive purposes but will cost the most. Especially if you start adding things like Red Dot Sights (RDS) and white lights.

A 2 day pistol or 3 day combination class is what I would suggest for most people. This allows you to get used to being in a structured class environment with other shooters and requires less investment in gear. A pistol, holster, magazines and magazine pouches are all you really need to start. If you plan on shooting a lot then I strongly suggest ballistic rated wraparound eye-protection (from Oakley) and electronic hearing protection (Sordin or Peltor).

2) More expensive isn’t necessarily better but neither is cheaper. For well known itinerant instructors expect to pay about $150-$200 a day for a class. Fixed facility trainers such as Gunsite or US Training Center (formerly Blackwater) will cost a bit more than that. If you have a local instructor or range that hosts classes it may be more convenient than traveling to another location. Factor in the cost of the class itself, ammunition required- including possible shipping fees if you’re flying, airfare or gas if you’re driving, lodging, food and the costs begin to add up. Some of this can be offset if you have a friend or shooting partner that would be willing to go with you.

3) Scheduling is tough for those whose day jobs don’t include going to shooting classes. For a regular civilian plan on having a travel day before and after the class dates. In the past I have traveled the day the class ended and it always leaves me exhausted when I have go to work the next day. Spending 2 or 3 or 5 days on a range and then switching gears to go back to work can be brutal.

I’ve finished classes only to run to the airport to catch a red eye or started a 9 hour drive back home. I would strongly discourage it, this extra day gives you time to decompress and digest the information you just spent so much time and money to learn. I’ve also seen it be a distraction as students start thinking about their travel plans rather than the training on the last day. The travel day before a class is probably more important as you want to give yourself enough time to set up your gear and enough rest to start the next day fresh.

4) Maybe you just want to improve your shooting skills, or you feel that your shooting skills are adequate but want to learn some tactics so that you can apply your shooting skills in a more realistic training environment. Either way this will be a critical factor in what type of class you choose. There are instructors who focus on the basics believing that without the fundamentals you cannot progress. Others assume you have the basic marksmanship skills and emphasize learning how to manipulate the weapon and fight.

5) There are a lot of great instructors out there who are known and populate internet forums and gun magazines. Finding which one suits you is a combination of all the factors already listed. You’ll rarely read any negative posts on internet forums, partly due to politics and because many people will not take the time to write about a class they weren’t happy with.

Most of the classes that I’ve taken have come from folks with a military background so I am comfortable with that type of crowd. Go with an open mind, thick skin and sense of humor and you’ll be fine.

The folks that I’ve trained with that served in a particular US Army Special Operations Unit place a strong emphasis on the fundamentals of marksmanship. For beginners or those looking to correct bad habits I would unhesitatingly recommend TigerSwan, Paul Howe or Larry Vickers. I’m planning on taking a class with Kyle Lamb of Viking Tactics in the summer and will be able to offer an informed opinion after the class.

The TigerSwan group is one of the best kept secrets in the firearms training world. Their instructors are drawn from the elite special operations units at Ft. Bragg, NC and have years of real world experience doing the very things that the rest of us watch on CNN. They are not the cheapest but because of that class sizes are usually smaller so you get a lot more attention than you do at other classes. I heard from a friend that they ran a 3 day class for a single student who showed up and classes usually have a 3 to 1 student/instructor ratio.

TigerSwan instructors watching students shoot pistol course of fire

TigerSwan instructors watching students shoot pistol course of fire

I’ve spent a lot of time training with Pat Rogers of EAG Tactical and in my opinion nobody does a better job of teaching you how to fight. I had to take his class a second and even third time before I could truly appreciate all the different aspects of what he was teaching. From shooting to tactics to mindset to weapon manipulations and the integration of gear to support the fight, Pat offers the total package.  Let me say that again, nobody teaches the total package better.  Pat offers a 2 Day basic carbine which I haven’t attended but if you have some basic carbine skills then his 3 day class is an excellent opportunity to get better.

Shooting on the move @ Quantico 3 Day Carbine Class with Pat Rogers

Shooting on the move @ Quantico 3 Day Carbine Class with Pat Rogers

The other instructor who has been most influential on me is Bennie Cooley. I’ve taken several classes with Bennie and he emphasizes thinking your way through the fight. Perfect practice develops the muscle memory to do it right. Once he establishes that you have the capability to accurately hit the target he will push you hard on speed or he will start adding different things to force you to think. His classes are more of an intermediate level and you will get more out of it if you are in good physical shape.

Bennie Cooley demonstrating barricade shooting technique

Bennie Cooley demonstrating barricade shooting technique

For fixed facilities I would recommend TDI-Ohio, not as well known as other, more famous schools out there but they have a low student/instructor ratio and very good facilities. Their cadre is drawn largely from law enforcement which is a plus as they offer a different perspective on things and may be more relevant to every day civilians. An added benefit is their class tuitions are more affordable than some of the bigger name schools. I took their Tac Rifle II class and was extremely impressed.  I’m planning on attending the first Tac Rifle III class later this year.